NJ now has a new aim.What aim?That is the photographers who always take photos of students by their cameras or camcoders.
Taking p
ictures of kids without parental consent could soon be against the law in New Jersey.Surprised?Look on.
ictures of kids without parental consent could soon be against the law in New Jersey.Surprised?Look on.“If you take a picture of your child at the Jersey Shore building a sand castle, and there were other children in the background, would that violate the law?” he asks.
The bill’s sponsor, Assemblyman David C. Russo, R-Bergen, tells the Star-Ledger it provides vital protection for children in an increasingly technological world.
The newspaper reports the bill was inspired when residents of Ringwood, N.J. complained about a 63-year-old man who was videotaping girls at a swim meet. He allegedly later told police he found 8- to 10-year-old girls “sexy.”
He man was charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct, but not a more serious crime. That ticks off some parents who think he (not to mention his ilk) belong behind bars.
“This man is a pervert, a sick individual, someone who could well be a pedophile,” Ridgewood parent Amy Conklin tells the Star-Ledger. “Our town is in an uproar … He is free to do as he wishes because these innocent 8-year-old girls were not naked when he videotaped them.”
没有评论:
发表评论